Child pages
  • Mean trophic level
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Draft

These pages are still under construction

 Indicator summary

 Summary of indicator structure and function

IndicatorAttributePurposeIf restricted to taxa, list which onesEcosystem applicabilityIdentified capabilityBiological classification levelResponse variableDriversRobustness
Mean trophic levelTrophic shifts, trophic structure fisheries Applicable to all systemsAspirationalEcosystemTrophodynamic AnthropogenicMedium to high

Examples of how the indicators is used for ecosystem management and ecosystem status and trends

Indicator examplesCurrent status and trendsManagement objective/directionStakeholder/Public acceptability
Examples of how the indicator is used.

Pick one of the following:

  • decreasing
  • increasing
  • stable
  • unclear
or should it be deteriorating, improving, stable, unclear

Pick one of the following: 

  • Conservation and Biodiversity
  • Ecosystem Stability and Resistance to perturbations
  • Ecosystem Structure and Functioning
  • Resource Potential

Pick one of the following: 

  • Widely accepted
  • Good public awareness
  • Weak public awareness
  • No public awareness
  • Unknown
    
    
    

Definition and/or background

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

Fish communities can be relatively hard to study (Jennings et al. 2001) and summary statistics for general community characteristics are very useful. One such statistic is mean trophic level, which can also be a good indicator of the effects of fishing (due to the preferential targeting of fish from higher trophic levels by fisheries). ... While this is an attractive indicator, the best means of calculating it has yet to be decided upon and it is likely to require a lot of data (e.g. diet information) and so may only be useful only in well-studied ecosystems (Rochet and Trenkel 2003).

Mean trophic level of the catch

Mean trophic level of the catch has also been used as a summary statistic for the consideration of broad-scale, coarsely resolved datasets such as the FAO dataset. The index is also the basis for other indicators, such as the “Fishery is balanced” (or FIB) index (see separate page). While these catch-based statistics can be informative, great care must be taken that they are not being confounded by economic forces guiding targeting or technological advances (Caddy and Garibaldi 2000).

Attribute

Trophic shifts, trophic structure

Purpose

fisheries

Taxa

Data required

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

  • Time series of biomass or abundance of species (or group) in the system
  • Time series of catch data by species (or group)
  • Diet composition (or at least basic understanding of usual feeding habits) of species (or groups) in the system or catch

Ecosystem applicability

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

 

Applicable to all systems.

Identified capability

Is there any additional information that would be of interest in regards to the identified capability?

Otherwise can leave this section blank and just fill in the table instead.

Biological classification level

Is there any additional information that would be of interest in regards to the biological classification?

Otherwise can leave this section blank and just fill in the table instead.

Response variable

Is there any additional information that would be of interest in regards to the response variable?

Otherwise can leave this section blank and just fill in the table instead.

Drivers

Is there any additional information that would be of interest in regards to ecological drivers?

If not can leave this section blank and just fill in the table instead.

Robustness

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

 

Medium to High: if based on fisheries independent data the trends in this statistic give a good indication of changes in community structure that result from the effects of fishing. The robustness is weakened if based solely on catch data (as that can be confounded by the usual concerns about catch data such as targeting and reporting), but it is still relatively sound given the simplicity and ease with which the indicator can be calculated. The indicator can be effected by other changes in the environment that also effect community composition, such as eutrophication, but that is true of all indicators considering community structure.

Current status and trends

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

A drop in the mean trophic level has been seen in both temperate (e.g. North sea, Greenstreet and Hall 1996) and tropical systems (e.g. Islands of the Philippines, Russ and Alcala 1996) and indicates a substantial shift in community structure as smaller, faster growing species which feed lower in the food web come to dominate the system.

Management strategies and/or objectives

define a standard set of management objectives?? ie from Indiseas

  • Conservations biodiversity
  • Ecosystem stability and resistance to perturbations
  • ecosystem structure and functioning
  • resource potential

has it been used in a management strategy? if so how?

relationship to management strategies/ objectives

Stakeholder/public acceptability

Acceptability with stakeholders

  • by all stakeholder
  • by the public
  • understandable to the stakeholders

Hyperlinks to organisations, databases, webportals, and ID books, that are associated with this indicator, if appropriate.

References

Fulton, E.A., Smith, A.D.M., Webb, H., and Slater, J. (2004a) Ecological indicators for the impacts of fishing on non-target species, communities and ecosystems: Review of potential indicators. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.

References that Fulton et al uses for this indicator:

 

Caddy, J. F., and L. Garibaldi. 2000. Apparent changes in the trophic composition of world marine harvests: the perspective from the FAO capture database. Ocean & Coastal Management 43: pp 615-55.

Greenstreet, S. P. R., and S. J. Hall. 1996. Fishing and the ground-fish assemblage structure in the north-western North Sea: an analysis of long-term and spatial trends. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: pp 577-98.

Jennings, S., M.J. Kaiser, and J.D. Reynolds. 2001Marine fisheries ecology.,. 417 p . London: Blackwell Science.

Rochet, M.-J., and V. M. Trenkel. 2003. Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? a review and proposals. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 60: pp 86-99.

 

Russ, G. R., and A. C. Alcala. 1996. Marine reserves: rates and patterns of recovery and decline of large predatory fish. Ecological Applications 6 , no. 3: pp 947-61.

Background reading

Fulton, E.A., Fuller,M., Smith, A.D.M., and Punt, A. (2004) Ecological indicators of the ecosystem effects of fishing: Final report. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.

 

Other references that can be used to update this page

 

Citation

Please cite this page as:

<>

Page created by:Shavawn Donoghue

Last modified on: Sep 04, 2012 16:20

Versions: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Reviewers

The macro included in this section of the template will automatically generate a list of reviewers who have viewed this page, and made comments.

Additional notes may include: personal communication, email feedback

Comment(s) made by: (see comments below)

  • No labels