Child pages
  • CCAMLR predator-prey-environmental index
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

AWAITING REVIEW

Indicator summary

Summary of indicator structure and function

Indicator

Attribute

Purpose

If restricted to taxa, list which ones

Ecosystem applicability

Identified capability

Biological classification level

Response variable

Drivers

Robustness

CCAMLR predator-prey-environmental index

Community structure and function, Trophic structure, Habitat structure and condition

CEMP

 

Potentially applicable for any marine ecosystem

Aspirational

Community. Ecosystem

Environment, Trophodynamic, Species-based

Trophodynamic

Potentially high


Definition and/or background

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

The CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program involves a wide range of measure designed to indicate the status of a number of species and environmental features (de le Mare and Constable 2000). However, for ease of interpretation, a single index is desirable and so the CCAMLR predator-prey-environment index was created. Thus, the CCAMLR predator-prey-environment index is similar in principle and function to an IBI, but its derivation has been dealt with far more formally with regard to the theories of multivariate statistics. Unfortunately, as yet its value has yet to be tested with real datasets, though an investigation of its robustness to missing data has been undertaken using Monte Carlo simulations (de le Mare and Constable 2000).  

Attribute

Community structure and function, Trophic structure, Habitat structure and condition

Purpose

CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP)

Taxa

Some penguins, seals, and flying birds that were selected as indicator species by CEMP.

Data required

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

Data for any selected metric to be included in the final summary index, e.g. biomass; density; diversity; abundance; recruitment; abiotic measures etc

Ecosystem applicability

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

Potentially applicable for any marine system, but it needs testing. Currently being considered for CCAMLR ecosystems.

Robustness

The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -

Potentially high: its advantages are that it is a single “user friendly” index that summarises a lot of biological and physical information. Its disadvantages are that it is affected by missing data if the time-series are not highly correlated (>0.6). However, criteria for determining appropriate parameters for inclusion in the index and a procedure for checking for anomalies have been proposed and are being tested (de le Mare and Constable 2000).  

References

Fulton, E.A., Smith, A.D.M., Webb, H., and Slater, J. (2004a) Ecological indicators for the impacts of fishing on non-target species, communities and ecosystems: Review of potential indicators. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.

References that Fulton et al uses for this indicator:

de lar Mare, W. K., and A. J. Constable. 2000. Utilising data from ecosystem monitoring for managing fisheries: development of statistical summaries of indices arising from the CCAMLR ecosystem monitoring program. CCAMLR Science 7: pp 101-17.

Background reading

Fulton, E.A., Fuller,M., Smith, A.D.M., and Punt, A. (2004) Ecological indicators of the ecosystem effects of fishing: Final report. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.

 

 

Citation

Please cite this page as:
SOKI Wiki (2014) Friday 11 Apr 2014.

Page created by:Shavawn Donoghue

Last modified on: Apr 11, 2014 15:12

Versions: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

  • No labels