AWAITING REVIEW
Indicator summary
Summary of indicator structure and function
Indicator | Attribute | Purpose | If restricted to taxa, list which ones | Ecosystem applicability | Identified capability | Biological classification level | Response variable | Drivers | Robustness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCAMLR predator-prey-environmental index | Community structure and function, Trophic structure, Habitat structure and condition | CEMP |
| Potentially applicable for any marine ecosystem | Aspirational | Community. Ecosystem | Environment, Trophodynamic, Species-based | Trophodynamic | Potentially high |
Definition and/or background
The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -
The CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program involves a wide range of measure designed to indicate the status of a number of species and environmental features (de le Mare and Constable 2000). However, for ease of interpretation, a single index is desirable and so the CCAMLR predator-prey-environment index was created. Thus, the CCAMLR predator-prey-environment index is similar in principle and function to an IBI, but its derivation has been dealt with far more formally with regard to the theories of multivariate statistics. Unfortunately, as yet its value has yet to be tested with real datasets, though an investigation of its robustness to missing data has been undertaken using Monte Carlo simulations (de le Mare and Constable 2000).
Attribute
Community structure and function, Trophic structure, Habitat structure and condition
Purpose
CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP)
Taxa
Some penguins, seals, and flying birds that were selected as indicator species by CEMP.
Data required
The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -
Data for any selected metric to be included in the final summary index, e.g. biomass; density; diversity; abundance; recruitment; abiotic measures etc
Ecosystem applicability
The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -
Potentially applicable for any marine system, but it needs testing. Currently being considered for CCAMLR ecosystems.
Robustness
The following is from Fulton et al 2004a -
Potentially high: its advantages are that it is a single “user friendly” index that summarises a lot of biological and physical information. Its disadvantages are that it is affected by missing data if the time-series are not highly correlated (>0.6). However, criteria for determining appropriate parameters for inclusion in the index and a procedure for checking for anomalies have been proposed and are being tested (de le Mare and Constable 2000).
References
Fulton, E.A., Smith, A.D.M., Webb, H., and Slater, J. (2004a) Ecological indicators for the impacts of fishing on non-target species, communities and ecosystems: Review of potential indicators. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.
References that Fulton et al uses for this indicator:
de lar Mare, W. K., and A. J. Constable. 2000. Utilising data from ecosystem monitoring for managing fisheries: development of statistical summaries of indices arising from the CCAMLR ecosystem monitoring program. CCAMLR Science 7: pp 101-17.
Background reading
Fulton, E.A., Fuller,M., Smith, A.D.M., and Punt, A. (2004) Ecological indicators of the ecosystem effects of fishing: Final report. AFMA Final Research Report, report Number R99/1546.
Citation
Please cite this page as:SOKI Wiki (2014) Friday 11 Apr 2014.
Page created by:Shavawn Donoghue
Last modified on: Apr 11, 2014 15:12